The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies
By Dirk De Clercq, W. Danis, Mourad Dakhli. 2010
272 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d36a8b46b4787e6498618fe833b8cadf3d9f472a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- David Urbano
- E. Stam
- David B. Audretsch
- N. Bosma
- M. Sanders
- Sebastian Aparicio
- Dirk De Clercq
- J. Content
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- David Urbano
- David B. Audretsch
- E. Stam
- Sebastian Aparicio
- N. Bosma
- Saurav Pathak
- M. Sanders
- Erkko Autio
In Strategy and Management
- David Urbano
- Saurav Pathak
- Dirk De Clercq
- David B. Audretsch
- Sebastian Aparicio
- E. Stam
- N. Bosma
- Erkko Autio
Citations in the corpus
- Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “16 Ben Letaifa and Goglio-Primard (2016), Fligstein (1997), Guerrero et al. (2014), Mair and Marti (2009), Toledano and Urbano (2008), Urbano et al.”
- How culture moulds the effects of self-efficacy and fear of failure on entrepreneurship (2013, background): “For example, De Clercq, Danis, and Dakhli (2010) report a positive relationship between in-group collectivism and national rates of entrepreneurship – in *Corresponding author.”
- Engagement in entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Interactive effects of individual-level factors and institutional conditions (2016, background): “…we measure the regulatory dimension of a country’s institutional condition as the averaged response to seven GEM NES questions that assess government policies, support programs, and regulations associated with entrepreneurship (De Clercq et al., 2010; Reynolds et al., 2005), as shown in Table 1.”