Efficacy of lures and hair snares to detect lynx

By Gregory W. Mcdaniel, Kevin S. McKelvey, J. Squires, L. Ruggiero. 2000

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d35ba5a534686b68eae7e326d1f0b5d7cddfc105

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. D. Schwartz
2. R. Long
3. T. Donovan
4. Kevin S. McKelvey
5. P. Mackay
6. K. Pilgrim
7. W. Zielinski
8. J. Buzas

Citations in the corpus

• Identifying lynx and other North American felids based on MtDNA analysis (2000, methodology): “Following development and successful validation of the protocol, we have begun using hair snags (McDaniel et al. 2000) in a nationwide survey including 12 states across the northern U.S. (McKelvey et al., in preparation).”
• Comparing Scat Detection Dogs, Cameras, and Hair Snares for Surveying Carnivores (2007, methodology): “We attached one snare to the target tree 40–45 cm above the ground (McDaniel et al. 2000; J. Weaver, personal communication).”