Comparing Scat Detection Dogs, Cameras, and Hair Snares for Surveying Carnivores

By R. Long, T. Donovan, P. Mackay, W. Zielinski, J. Buzas. 2007

218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Virology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a7d28099bde8337bb810ea2ae9de9645fc08fc5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. T. Donovan
2. P. Mackay
3. R. Long
4. J. Buzas
5. W. Zielinski
6. Andrew J. Plumptre
7. A. Treves
8. P. Mwima

Citations in the corpus

• Effectiveness of Scat Detection Dogs for Detecting Forest Carnivores (2007, background): “The costs associated with using detection dogs for wildlife field surveys can vary greatly, depending on the circumstances of the survey (Harrison 2006, Long et al. 2007).”
• Predicting carnivore occurrence with noninvasive surveys and occupancy modeling (2011, methodology): “These values for detecting fishers were 0.840, 0.890, and 0.997, respectively (Long et al. 2007b).”
• Camera-trapping forest–woodland wildlife of western Uganda reveals how gregariousness biases estimates of relative abundance and distribution (2010, background): “Thus we are building upon prior work that showed detectability varying with species traits and behavioral ecology (Larrucea et al., 2007; Long et al., 2007; O’Brien et al., 2003; Tobler et al., 2008).”