Defining conservation priorities for freshwater fishes according to taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity

By A. Strecker, Julian D. Olden, Joanna B. Whittier, C. Paukert. 2011

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a97baaf0b6c8515847d2b3007e254c8ee4f91488

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. G. Grenouillet
2. M. Akasaka
3. Thomas Pool
4. Takehiro Sasaki
5. S. Matsuzaki
6. Sébastien Villéger
7. Francesco de Bello

In Ecology

1. Sébastien Villéger
2. G. Grenouillet
3. M. Akasaka
4. Thomas Pool
5. Takehiro Sasaki
6. S. Matsuzaki

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. G. Grenouillet
2. Sébastien Villéger
3. M. Akasaka
4. Thomas Pool
5. Takehiro Sasaki
6. S. Matsuzaki
7. S. Brosse
8. J. Cucherousset

Citations in the corpus

• Species contribute differently to the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic alpha and beta diversity of freshwater fish communities (2014, background): “Similarly, Strecker et al. (2011) found 75% congruence between the TD, FD and PD of priority areas identified using distribution models for freshwater fishes in the Southwestern United States.”
• Consequences of the introduction of exotic and translocated species and future extirpations on the functional diversity of freshwater fish assemblages (2013, background): “Understanding and predicting FD patterns is essential for improving current conservation strategies based on species richness (Devictor et al., 2010; Cadotte et al., 2011; Strecker et al., 2011).”