Inducing Ontology from Flickr Tags

By P. Schmitz. 2006

392 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d30e7d2d336d1cb8704e1a599db3071c2ff36b75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge (2008, methodology): “Several variations of asymmetric co-occurrence measure have been proposed in literature before to build tag (or term) hierarchies [20] [17] [21].”
Scene Summarization for Online Image Collections (2007, methodology): “Schmitz [24] uses a similar approach but relies on Flickr tags, which are typically noisier and less informative than the captions.”
Exploring place through user-generated content: Using Flickr tags to describe city cores (2010, background): “The potential and drawbacks of content in tagging systems in terms of information organization and retrieval [14,39], the generation of ontologies [32], and its suitability to represent the perception of the individual [17], as well as distributed knowledge or the wisdom of the crowd [36,38] have…”
Integrating Folksonomies with the Semantic Web (2007, background): “Schmitz et al. (2006) extract association rules between projections of pairs of elements from the tripartite model of folksonomies, i.e., users, resources and tags.”
Evaluating similarity measures for emergent semantics of social tagging (2009, unknown): “Others have proposed alternative approaches for extracting taxonomic relations or inferring global semantics from a folksonomy [43, 42, 16, 49].”
A performance evaluation of gradient field HOG descriptor for sketch based image retrieval (2013, methodology): “In our system we leverage keyword co-occurrence, a text matrix widely used in information retrieval, and recommendation systems [42, 43] as well as in building word ontologies [44] and improving the image annotation performance [45].”
What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education (2007, background): “His goal is to develop a system that retains the flexibility of free tagging for annotation but make uses of ontology in the search and browse interface (Schmitz, 2006).”