The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review.

By Russell D. Monds, G. O’Toole. Trends in Microbiology, 2009

614 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2b7e19b4e6bae35302d31c323fe43c1c75fead3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Maria Kostakioti
2. Peter D. Steinberg
3. M. Hadjifrangiskou
4. S. Hultgren

In Genetics

1. Peter D. Steinberg

In Molecular Biology

1. Peter D. Steinberg
2. Maria Kostakioti
3. S. Kjelleberg
4. M. Hadjifrangiskou
5. S. Hultgren

Citations in the corpus

• Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal (2011, background): “Gene expression, morphology, phenotype, and the stage of differentiation and development vary between the cells in a mature biofil”
• Bacterial Biofilms: Development, Dispersal, and Therapeutic Strategies in the Dawn of the Postantibiotic Era (2013, background): “…networks, which translate signals to concerted gene expression changes thereby mediating the spatial and temporal reorganization of the bacterial cell (Pratt and Kolter 1998; O’Toole et al. 2000; Prigent-Combaret et al. 2001; Parsek and Singh 2003; Lenz et al. 2008; Monds and O’Toole 2009).”