Crystallinity of wood and the size of cellulose crystallites in Norway spruce (Picea abies)

By S. Andersson, R. Serimaa, T. Paakkari, P. Saranpää, E. Pesonen. Journal of Wood Science, 2003

247 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Archeology, Biomaterials, Building and Construction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2a510fa283f33f1e1a1bd29f564fd1abfa747f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Archeology

1. Y. Ni
2. R. Reiner
3. U. Agarwal
4. S. Ralph

In Biomaterials

1. U. Agarwal
2. K. Kulasinski
3. I. Kontro
4. A. Saeed
5. Y. Ni
6. D. Apperley
7. Jan Carmeliet
8. V. Trevor Forsyth

Citations in the corpus

• Cellulose I crystallinity determination using FT–Raman spectroscopy: univariate and multivariate methods (2010, background): “Moreover, in samples where hemicellulose and pectins are present, their contributions cause extra scattering and lead to an inaccurate measurement of the cellulose crystallinity (Andersson et al. 2003).”
• Nanostructure of cellulose microfibrils in spruce wood (2011, methodology): “The radial width of the 200 reflection, corresponding to the intersheet spacing in cellulose Iβ, has been widely used as a guide to the diameter of the crystalline part of the microfibril through the Scherrer equation which relates peak broadening inversely to the number of diffracting lattice plane”
• Jute as raw material for the preparation of microcrystalline cellulose (2011, background): “In our earlier study, it was found that the cellulose crystallinity proportion of jute fibre (73%) was much higher than that from other non-wood (Jahan and Mun 2009) or wood species ( Andersson et al. 2003; Fengel and Wegener 1989).”
• Diameter dependence of the apparent tensile modulus of hemp fibres: A morphological, structural or ultrastructural effect? (2012, background): “The cellulose unit cells are organised in a crystalline network, which forms microfibrils with a lateral thickness of about 2-5 nm and a length of 30 nm [5].”
• A comparative molecular dynamics study of crystalline, paracrystalline and amorphous states of cellulose (2014, background): “Wood microfibrils are 3 nm by 3 nm in cross section and up to few micrometer in length (Andersson et al. 2003).”
• The Influence of Cellulose Content on Tensile Strength in Tree Roots (2005, background): “A further experiment whereby only crystalline cellulose was measured would help determine the influence of cellulose content on wood tensile strength (Akerholm et al., 2004; Andersson et al., 2003).”
• Comparison of sample crystallinity determination methods by X-ray diffraction for challenging cellulose I materials (2016, methodology): “Set-up 2 is a fourcircle goniometer (Andersson et al. 2003) that was used for all ST measurements.”