Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention.
By Jeff Miller. 1991
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Mary K. Ngo
- A. Klapetek
- Charles Spence
- Yi-Chuan Chen
- Carlos Velasco
- Jeroen J. Stekelenburg
- Mirjam Keetels
- Camille Koppen
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “Specifically, reaction times on the bimodally congruent trials were significantly faster than on the bimodally incongruent trials, a result that can perhaps best be explained in terms of the effect of semantic congruency on the redundant targets effect (see Miller, 1991; Laurienti et al., 2004).”
- Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search? (2012, methodology): “Given that such findings cannot be explained in terms of decision- or response-related mechanisms, Parise and Spence’s (2009) results seem to reflect the tendency of our cognitive systems to integrate crossmodally congruent stimuli at a perceptual level (see also Bien, ten Oever, Goebel, & Sack, 201”