Robust Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots
By Sebastian Thrun, Dieter Fox, Wolfram Burgard, Frank Dellaert. Artificial Intelligence, 2001
2,054 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d209d62ddcd90afb8d5ea8d259ec851a48235dc7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- Sebastian Thrun
- Tim Bailey
- Wolfram Burgard
- John J. Leonard
- Paul M. Newman
- Michael Kaess
- Michael Montemerlo
- Dieter Fox
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Dieter Fox
- Pieter Abbeel
- Sebastian Thrun
- Yoshua Bengio
- Chelsea Finn
- Joelle Pineau
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Sebastian Thrun
- Tim Bailey
- Andrew Howard
- Michael Montemerlo
- John J. Leonard
- Paul M. Newman
- Seth J. Teller
- Dieter Fox
Citations in the corpus
- The Player/Stage Project: Tools for Multi-Robot and Distributed Sensor Systems (2003, methodology): “By minimizing constraints on the control program, Player and Stage offer a uniquely ¤exible robot development environment compared to others such as Saphira [16], Mission Lab [17], TeamBots [2], Ayllu [32], DCA [21], ARIA [1], and CARMEN [26].”
- Localization for mobile sensor networks (2004, methodology): “Our work adapts the Monte Carlo localization (MCL) method [10, 42] developed for use in robotics localization for use in mobile sensor network applications.”
- Socially compliant mobile robot navigation via inverse reinforcement learning (2016, methodology): “We localize the robot in a static map using laser-based Monte Carlo Localization (Thrun et al., 2000).”
- Active localization with dynamic obstacles (2016, methodology): “We employ a particle filter [18], [19], [20] to solve the passive global localization problem.”
- A Statistical Modeling Approach to Location Estimation (2002, methodology): “There are several empirical methods for location estimation, such as RADAR [2], Nibble [8], RadioCamera [15], and the ones developed in the robotics community (see [ 28 ] and the references therein).”
- Multi-robot Simultaneous Localization and Mapping using Particle Filters (2005, methodology): “It is also very easy to implement: the sensor model S and action model A are identical to those used in the standard MonteCarlo localization algorithm (Thrun et al. 2001), and the map generator M is a simple ray-tracing algorithm.”
- A Generalized Extended Kalman Filter Implementation for the Robot Operating System (2014, methodology): “We plan to add new nodes in the future, such as an unscented Kalman filter [13] node and a particle filter [14] node.”
- Adapting the Sample Size in Particle Filters Through KLD-Sampling (2003, methodology): “Furthermore, our approach can be combined with any other method for improving the efficiency of particle filters (Gilks and Berzuini 2001; Pitt and Shephard 1999; Godsill and Clapp 2001; Thrun et al. 2001).”
- Learning Deployable Navigation Policies at Kilometer Scale from a Single Traversal (2018, background): “Traditional approaches have consisted of localisation techniques, often in conjunction with mapping, in order to form as complete a picture as possible of the joint configuration of the world and the robot [1, 2].”
- Biips: Software for Bayesian Inference with Interacting Particle Systems (2014, background): “They have found numerous applications in signal filtering and robotics (Thrun et al. 2001; Gustafsson et al. 2002; Vermaak et al. 2002; Vo et al. 2003; Ristic et al. 2004; Caron et al. 2007), systems biology (Golightly and Wilkinson 2006, 2011; Bouchard-Côté et al. 2012), economics and…”
- Finding Approximate POMDP solutions Through Belief Compression (2011, neutral): “Such state estimators as the Kalman lter (Leonard & Durrant-Whyte, 1991) or Markov localization (Fox, Burgard, & Thrun, 1999; Thrun, Fox, Burgard, & Dellaert, 2000 ) provide a (possibly factored, Boyen & Koller, 1998) distribution over possible states of the world instead of a single (possibly inco”
- Perspectives on standardization in mobile robot programming: the Carnegie Mellon Navigation (CARMEN) Toolkit (2003, methodology): “Previous implementations [12] of mobile robot control software favoured a multi-level support, with coarse strategic planning providing intermediate goals to a lower-level collision avoidance module [2].”
- Anytime Point-Based Approximations for Large POMDPs (2006, background): “While this may seem like a generous (or optimistic) assumption, substantial experience with domains of this size and maps of this quality have demonstrated robust localization abilities (Thrun et al., 2000).”
- The spherical simplex unscented transformation (2003, methodology): “Although the method is potentially extremely powerful, it requires a large number of sample points for reliable estimates (Thrun [ 6 ] reports several thousand for a 3 dimensional navigation system).”
- Autonomous discovery of temporal abstractions from interaction with an environment (2002, background): “With the ability to use GPS outdoors or the ability to estimate position indoors (Thrun et al., 2000), this is not an unrealistic assumption.”