MIMIC-CXR, a de-identified publicly available database of chest radiographs with free-text reports

By Alistair E. W. Johnson, Tom J. Pollard, Seth J. Berkowitz, N. Greenbaum, Matthew P. Lungren, Chih-Ying Deng, R. Mark, Steven Horng. 2019

2,082 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Chest radiography is an extremely powerful imaging modality, allowing for a detailed inspection of a patient’s chest, but requires specialized training for proper interpretation. With the advent of high performance general purpose computer vision algorithms, the accurate automated analysis of chest radiographs is becoming increasingly of interest to researchers. Here we describe MIMIC-CXR, a large dataset of 227,835 imaging studies for 65,379 patients presenting to the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Emergency Department between 2011–2016. Each imaging study can contain one or more images, usually a frontal view and a lateral view. A total of 377,110 images are available in the dataset. Studies are made available with a semi-structured free-text radiology report that describes the radiological findings of the images, written by a practicing radiologist contemporaneously during routine clinical care. All images and reports have been de-identified to protect patient privacy. The dataset is made freely available to facilitate and encourage a wide range of research in computer vision, natural language processing, and clinical data mining. Measurement(s) Radiograph • investigation results report Technology Type(s) Chest Radiography • digital curation • Radiologist Sample Characteristic - Organism Homo sapiens Measurement(s) Radiograph • investigation results report Technology Type(s) Chest Radiography • digital curation • Radiologist Sample Characteristic - Organism Homo sapiens Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10303823

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Jianfeng Gao
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Christopher D. Manning
  4. Percy Liang
  5. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  6. Noah A. Smith
  7. Yoshua Bengio
  8. Kyunghyun Cho

In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

  1. Matthew P. Lungren
  2. Marzyeh Ghassemi
  3. Pranav Rajpurkar
  4. Andrew Y. Ng
  5. Matthew B. A. McDermott
  6. Xiaosong Wang

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. Matthew P. Lungren
  2. Pranav Rajpurkar
  3. Marzyeh Ghassemi
  4. Daguang Xu
  5. Andrew Y. Ng
  6. Matthew B. A. McDermott
  7. Curtis P. Langlotz
  8. Jianwei Yang

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Jianfeng Gao
  2. Christopher D. Manning
  3. Dan Jurafsky
  4. Jianwei Yang
  5. Chunyuan Li
  6. Mohit Bansal
  7. Matthew P. Lungren
  8. Haotian Liu

Citations in the corpus