Carbon Abatement Costs: Why the Wide Range of Estimates?

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Counting only the hits? The risk of underestimating the costs of stringent climate policy (2010, methodology): “Essentially, we conduct a meta-analysis (Barker et al. 2002; Fischer and Morgenstern 2006; Kuik et al. 2009; Repetto and Austin 1997) and use the estimated”
Why Economic Analysis Supports Strong Action on Climate Change: A Response to the Stern Review's Critics (2008, methodology): “analyses of Fischer and Morgenstern, 2005, and Bark er et al ., 2006, very valuable in isolating the”
Targets for global climate policy: an overview (2013, background): “…Hourcade et al., 1996, 2001); there are the EMF 5 overview papers (Weyant, 1993, 1998, 2004; Weyant et al., 2006; Weyant and Hill, 1999), and there are meta-analyses as well (Barker et al., 2002; Fischer and Morgenstern, 2006; Kuik et al., 2009; Repetto and Austin, 1997; Tavoni and Tol, 2010).”
Output-Based Allocation of Emissions Permits for Mitigating Tax and Trade Interactions (2007, unknown): “Most of the major climate models are much more highly aggregated, with five or fewer nonenergy sectors (Fischer and Morgenstern 2006).”