Attitude Change in Competitive Framing Environments? Open-/Closed-Mindedness, Framing Effects, and Climate Change
By Erik C. Nisbet, P. Sol Hart, Teresa A. Myers, Morgan E. Ellithorpe. 2013
133 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1b9d7d7282ac4e31f60112055ebad9aae26f969
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Lauren A. Feldman
- P. Sol Hart
- Will J. Grant
- Christopher E. Clarke
- Jeffrey Jacquet
- Jonathon P. Schuldt
- R. Stedman
- Rebecca M. Colvin
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jonathon P. Schuldt
- Jeffrey Jacquet
- Lauren A. Feldman
- P. Sol Hart
- Will J. Grant
- Christopher E. Clarke
- R. Stedman
- Rebecca M. Colvin
Citations in the corpus
- Public opinion on energy development: the interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology (2015, background): “Framing effects occur when individuals use these frames “when constructing meaning, processing information, and making evaluations or decisions” (Nisbet et al., 2013, p. 2; Chong and Druckman, 2007).”
- Climate change as a polarizing cue: Framing effects on public support for low-carbon energy policies (2018, background): “, 2012; Truelove, 2012) and a mediator of framing effects on policy opinions (Clarke et al., 2015; Nisbet et al., 2013).”
- Framing climate change for effective communication: a systematic map (2020, background): “Our study highlights a strong tendency in the literature towards understanding unidirectional communication (in the media and experiments) whereas in reality, competing climate change frames exist together and in two-way communication contexts (Chong andDruckman 2007, Nisbet et al 2013).”