Public opinion on energy development: the interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Climate change as a polarizing cue: Framing effects on public support for low-carbon energy policies (2018, background): “For example, Cohen (2003) found that political party endorsements – by triggering a process of motivated reasoning – shape policy perceptions, even overwhelming the influence of the ideological content of the policy itself.”
Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014 (2019, result): “Scholars have speculated that uncertainty frames confuse the public about the state of the science, and reduce their propensity to engage in mitigation behavior (Boykoff and Boykoff, 2007), and there is some experimental evidence in support of that notion (Dixon and Clarke, 2013; Clarke et al., 2015”
You are fake news: political bias in perceptions of fake news (2020, methodology): “A classic method in psychology (Szalay and Deese, 1978), top-of-mind (ToM) associations can be thought of as mental representations of an issue, that is the first words, thoughts, or symbols that come to mind when prompted with a cue (Clarke et al., 2015; Nelson et al., 2000).”