Regional Innovation Policy for Small-Medium Enterprises
By Bjørn T. Asheim, Arne Isaksen, C. Nauwelaers, Franz Tödtling. 2003
176 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1b0234a6f6fd1a5a8e3009237bd5953cead87e9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- Michaela Trippl
- Robert Huggins
- Franz Tödtling
- Andrew Johnston
- Bjørn T. Asheim
- Piers Thompson
- David Doloreux
- Markus Grillitsch
Citations in the corpus
- Innovator networks and regional knowledge base (2008, background): “Another group of researchers (e.g. Asheim & Isaksen 2002, Doloreux 2002, Asheim et al. 2003, Fritsch & Franke 2004, Cantner & Graf 2006) concentrates on ”Regional Innovation Systems”.”
- Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues (2005, background): “SME policy and the regional dimension of innovation (SMEPOL) [30,41] 11 European regions (Upper Austria, Wallonia, the Triangle region in southern Jutland, Lombardy and Apulia in Italy, Limburg, northern and south-eastern Norway, Valencia, parts of London and parts of Herfordshire) Analyze in a comp”
- DIFFERENTIATED KNOWLEDGE BASES AND VARIETIES OF REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS (2007, background): “…such as branches of industry associations and chambers of commerce, and public organizations such as regional agencies with powers devolved from the national (or, within the European Union, supra-national) level to promote enterprise and innovation support (Asheim et al., 2003; Cooke et al., 2000).”
- Network Capital, Social Capital and Knowledge Flow: How the Nature of Inter-organizational Networks Impacts on Innovation (2012, background): “In general, inter-organizational knowledge networks are considered to be a crucial element underlying the economic success and competitiveness of regions (Asheim et al., 2003; Bathelt et al., 2004; Cooke et al., 2004; Rutten and Boekema, 2007; Kräkte, 2010).”
- The Cluster Policies Whitebook (2004, background): “The absence of critical mass or a “thinner” local basis may conversely make a country or a region vulnerable to the loss of specific resources and skills that form essential building blocks in cluster development (Asheim et al., 2003).”
- One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach (2005, background): “…should give priority to organisational and technological “catching up learning” (introduction of “up to date” management technique, organisational practices, product and process technologies) and should target SMEs and their innovation weaknesses (Tödtling and Kaufmann 2002, Asheim et al. 2003).”