Testing the persuasiveness of evidence: Combining narrative and statistical forms

By Mike Allen, Rebecca Bruflat, Renée Fucilla, M. Kramer, Steve McKellips, Daniel J. Ryan, Marieke Spiegelhoff. 2000

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1aea80b51277464b4810d05bd6a5241cdf6734e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Weichen Liu
2. Sijia Xiao
3. Ming Yang
4. Jacob T. Browne
5. Steven W. Dow

Citations in the corpus

• Social norms and expectancy violation theories: assessing the effectiveness of health communication campaigns (2004, unknown): “Studies using statistical evidence in messages have demonstrated the persuasive efficacy of this approach (e.g., Allen et al., 2000; Boster et al., 2000; Slater & Rouner, 1996).”
• ConsensUs (2018, background): “Allen et al. also found that when a message contained both types of information, it was more persuasive than narrative arguments or quantitative evidence on its own (Allen et al. 2000).”