Resource partitioning and niche hyper‐volume overlap in free‐living Pygoscelid penguins

By Rory P. Wilson. 2010

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d160ca6b0bf958780ff3dfa76a37e50ed6bc8970

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Masello
2. P. Quillfeldt
3. Roger Mundry
4. Martin Wikelski
5. A. Miller
6. Michelle A. Kappes
7. C. Voigt
8. L. Demongin

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Masello
2. P. Quillfeldt
3. Roger Mundry
4. Martin Wikelski
5. Michelle A. Kappes
6. C. Voigt
7. S. Cooke
8. L. Garamszegi

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Roger Mundry
2. Martin Wikelski
3. Michelle A. Kappes
4. L. Garamszegi

Citations in the corpus

• Foraging-Niche Separation of Breeding Gentoo and Chinstrap Penguins, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica (2010, background): “Kokubun et al. (2010) and Wilson (2010) also compared the foraging niches of sympatrically breeding Chinstrap and Gentoo Penguins.”
• Diving seabirds share foraging space and time within and among species (2010, background): “…species-specific differences in foraging areas (e.g., Croxall and Prince 1980, Trivelpiece et al. 1987, Weimerskirch et al. 1993, Frere et al. 2008, Wilson 2010), diving depths (e.g., Mori and Boyd 2004, Wilson 2010), diet choice (e.g., Baltz et al. 1979, Ridoux 1994, Kato et al. 1996, Weiss et…”