Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer (1973 through 1998), featuring cancers with recent increasing trends.

By H. Howe, P. Wingo, M. Thun, L. Ries, H. Rosenberg, E. Feigal, B. Edwards. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2001

846 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Serum protein fingerprinting coupled with a pattern-matching algorithm distinguishes prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia and healthy men. (2002, background): “A donor was selected for the HM group if he had a normal DRE, a PSA 4.0 ng/ml, and no evidence of prostatic disease.”
Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1999, featuring implications of age and aging on U.S. cancer burden (2002, background): “(breast, prostate, lung, and colon/rectum), which make up more than half the cancer burden.(4) The”
Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. (2002, background): “breast cancer mortality ( 50 ), independent of effects attributable to early detection and treatment of invasive disease and independent of recent advances in breast cancer treatment, then some women who have been treated for screen-detected DCIS have benefited.”
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, part I: National cancer statistics (2018, background): “This article has been contributed to by US Government employees, and their work is in the public domain in the United States.”