Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.

By V. Ernster, R. Ballard-Barbash, W. Barlow, Yingye Zheng, D. Weaver, G. Cutter, B. Yankaskas, R. Rosenberg, P. Carney, K. Kerlikowske and 3 more. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002

619 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a58c3050182f9616c50036255f9b3d26118a3b7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. J. Chhatwal
2. Oğuzhan Alagöz
3. E. Burnside
4. Robert Kane
5. Jens langhoff-roos
6. Steen Rasmussen
7. Ida Vogel
8. B. Jacobsson

Citations in the corpus

• Spontaneous preterm delivery in primiparous women at low risk in Denmark: population based study (2006, background): “Previous research has shown that at least 94% of cancer cases are identified through these linkages (27).”
• Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. (2010, background): “83 per 1000 for subsequent screening mammograms (26).”
• Optimal Breast Biopsy Decision-Making Based on Mammographic Features and Demographic Factors (2010, background): “For example, aggressive diagnosis of low grade or pre-invasive lesions in older women (women 65 years or older) might represent overdiagnosis that does not contribute to reduced morbidity or mortality because of limited life expectancy (Ernster et al. 1996,2002).”