Preventing and Reducing Juvenile Delinquency: A Comprehensive Framework

By James C. Howell. 2003

306 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0d675d500701ea60e0c347d3b37301f2494f2ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A Gender-Specific Pathway to Serious, Violent, and Chronic Offending? (2009, background): “Specifically, we explore the proposition about a female-specific pathway to serious, violent, and chronic offending suggested by James Howell (2003), who proposes five risk factors as potentially being more important than others for this subgroup of girls involved in serious, violent, and chronic of”
Never too late (2010, background): “DiIulio’s disquieting depiction of juvenile offenders assumed an aura of legitimacy because it was voiced in the midst of a dramatic rise in youthful violence (Zimring, 2005; for an alternative view on offenders, see Howell, 2003).”
A Meta-Analysis of Juvenile Justice Risk Assessment Instruments (2008, background): “These efforts correspond with the increasingly structured approach to juvenile justice decisionmaking that includes such companion decision aids as structured needs assessment, mental health screening instruments, and semideterminant disposition matrices (Howell, 2003).”
Youth Development and Reentry (2004, background): “Although few empirical tests of the IAP have been conducted to date, a primary strength of the IAP is its reliance on theory and research about principles of effective intervention (Howell, 2003).”
In Between Adolescence and Adulthood (2005, background): “There has been much attention paid to the life circumstances and offending patterns of serious and high-rate juveniles during the past two decades (see Howell, 2003b; Loeber & Farrington, 1998).”
Similarities and Differences in Risk Factors for Violent Offending and Gang Membership (2009, background): “Cumulative risk is not only related to the number of factors present, but also to the number of risk factors in each domain, as well as the number of domains in which risk factors exist (Howell, 2003; Saner & Ellickson, 1996; Thornberry, 1998; Thornberry et al., 2003).”
The School-to-Prison Pipeline: Disproportionate Impact on Vulnerable Children and Adolescents (2017, background): “…violence, trauma, academic and learning problems, mental health difficulties, and unstable and disorganized neighborhoods that are primarily in urban areas, among others (Abram et al., 2013; Cuevas, Finkelhor, Shattuck, Turner, & Hamby, 2013; Howell, 2003; Langrehr, 2011; Leone & Weinberg, 2010).”
Gang Membership as a Risk Factor for Adolescent Violent Victimization (2007, background): “For example, gang members continue to be at increased risk relative to non-gang members for homicide victimization (Howell 1999; Maxson 1999; Maxson et al. 2002).”
Reconciling the Differences Between the “Gender-Responsive” and the “What Works” Literatures to Improve Services for Girls (2008, background): “They exist within five broad domains including individual, family, school, peers, and community domains (Howell, 2003).”
Rehabilitation: Beyond Nothing Works (2013, background): “The more difficult challenge is to envision early intervention and corrections not as separate spheres of treatment with separate missions (Lösel 2007; Howell 2009).”