Neuronal circuits underlying persistent representations despite time varying activity.
By Shaul Druckmann, Dmitri "Mitya" Chklovskii. 2012
172 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Timothy O’Leary
- Michael Everett Rule
- Mark M. Churchland
- K. C. Ames
- Christopher D. Harvey
- B. Strowbridge
- N. A. Cayco-Gajic
- R. Silver
Citations in the corpus
- Re-evaluating circuit mechanisms underlying pattern separation (2019, neutral): “The coding subspace is a subset of activity space, which represents all possible neural activity patterns, including ‘non-coding’ subspaces that are observed but that do not represent changes in stimuli or behaviour (Druckmann and Chklovskii, 2012), as well as neural states that never occur.”
- Causes and consequences of representational drift (2019, background): “This implies that neuronal activity could drift in directions unrelated to encoding or task performance [25,30].”
- Dynamics of robust pattern separability in the hippocampal dentate gyrus (2015, background): “Given the importance of persistent representations, formed by dynamical neural activities (Druckmann and Chklovskii, 2012), we suspect that similar representational structures might be quite ubiquitous within the nervous system.”
- Motor cortex signals for each arm are mixed across hemispheres and neurons yet partitioned within the population response (2019, background): “…in motor cortex are ‘muscle potent’ – activity in those dimensions produces output that will influence the muscles – while other dimensions are ‘muscle null’ – activity in those dimensions has no direct outgoing impact on muscle activity (Druckmann and Chklovskii, 2012; Kaufman et al., 2014).”
- Motor cortex embeds muscle-like commands in an untangled population response (2018, unknown): “As the network follows that three-dimensional trajectory, the figure-eight pattern can still be ‘‘read out’’ via projection, with the third dimension falling in the null space of the readout (Druckmann and Chklovskii, 2012; Kaufman et al., 2014).”