Dynamics of robust pattern separability in the hippocampal dentate gyrus
By J. Zylberberg, R. Hyde, B. Strowbridge. 2015
10 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The dentate gyrus (DG) is thought to perform pattern separation on inputs received from the entorhinal cortex, such that the DG forms distinct representations of different input patterns. Neuronal responses, however, are known to be variable, and that variability has the potential to confuse the representations of different inputs, thereby hindering the pattern separation function. This variability can be especially problematic for tissues such as the DG, in which the responses can persist for tens of seconds following stimulation: the long response duration allows for variability from many different sources to accumulate. To understand how the DG can robustly encode different input patterns, we investigated a recently developed in vitro hippocampal DG preparation that generates persistent responses to transient electrical stimulation. For 10–20 s after stimulation, the responses are indicative of the pattern of stimulation that was applied, even though the responses exhibit significant trial‐to‐trial variability. Analyzing the dynamical trajectories of the evoked responses, we found that, following stimulation, the neural responses follow distinct paths through the space of possible neural activations, with a different path associated with each stimulation pattern. The neural responses' trial‐to‐trial variability shifts the responses along these paths rather than between them, maintaining the separability of the input patterns. Manipulations that redistributed the variability more isotropically over the space of possible neural activations impeded the pattern separation function. Consequently, we conclude that the confinement of neuronal variability to these one‐dimensional paths mitigates the impacts of variability on pattern encoding and, thus, may be an important aspect of the DG's ability to robustly encode input patterns. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
In Cognitive Neuroscience
Citations in the corpus
- Re-evaluating circuit mechanisms underlying pattern separation (2019, positive): “In the dentate gyrus, a recent study tested the relationship between signal and noise by intracellularly recording from triplets of mossy cells in vitro while stimulating the perforant path in different locations (Zylberberg et al., 2016).”