The effect of clusters on the survival and performance of new firms

293 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Entrepreneurship and the determinants of firm survival within regions: human capital, growth motivation and locational conditions (2017, unknown): “The final locational factor is associated with the negative competition (Helmers and Rogers 2008; Fotopoulos and Louri 2000), and positive industry clustering (Wennberg and Lindqvist 2010) effects from industrial density.”
Clusters and entrepreneurship (2010, unknown): “As a result, entrepreneurship is a particularly important channel for cluster-driven agglomeration, and may therefore be crucial for the role of clusters in enhancing regional performance (Porter, 1998a; Saxenian, 1994; Swann et al., 1998; Feldman, 2001; Feldman, Francis, and Bercovitz, 2005; Feser,”
Industrial Dynamics and Clusters: A Survey (2015, methodology): “Similarly, WENNBERG and LINDQVIST (2010) analysed firm-level data for Swedish firms started in the telecom and consumer electronics, financial services, information technology, medical equipment, and pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical sectors, and found evidence for localization economies when…”
Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity (2011, unknown): “However, successful regions as a relevant entity should affect the behavior and performance of local firms (Boschma 2004; Mueller et al. 2008; Beaudry and Swann 2009; Wennberg and Lindqvist 2010).”