Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization
By Ilya Loshchilov, Frank Hutter. 2017
36,546 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Optimization & Training
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Optimization & Training
- Yoshua Bengio
- Quoc V. Le
- Martin Jaggi
- Frank Hutter
- Soham De
- Sergey Levine
- Samuel L. Smith
- Sebastian U. Stich
Citations in the corpus
- Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models (2022, positive): “We find that, independent of the learning rate schedule, AdamW trained models outperform models trained with Adam.”
- LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models (2023, methodology): “Our models are trained using the AdamW optimizer (Loshchilov and Hutter, 2017), with the following hyper-parameters: β1 = 0.”
- Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models (2023, methodology): “For all models, we use the AdamW optimizer (Loshchilov and Hutter, 2017), with β1 = 0.”
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision (2021, methodology): “We use the Adam optimizer (Kingma & Ba, 2014) with decoupled weight decay regularization (Loshchilov & Hutter, 2017) applied to all weights that are not gains or biases, and decay the learning rate using a cosine schedule (Loshchilov & Hutter, 2016).”
- End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers (2020, methodology): “We train DETR with AdamW [26] setting the initial transformer’s learning rate to 10−4, the backbone’s to 10−5, and weight decay to 10−4.”
- UNITER: Learning UNiversal Image-TExt Representations (2019, methodology): “We use AdamW optimizer (Loshchilov & Hutter, 2019) with a learning rate of 3 e − 4 and weight decay of 0 .”
- Technical report on Conversational Question Answering (2019, methodology): “We use AdamW (Loshchilov and Hutter, 2017) as our optimizer with a learning rate of 5e-5 and a batch size of 48.”
- Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelism (2019, methodology): “For our optimizer we utilize Adam (Kingma & Ba, 2014) with weight decay (Loshchilov & Hutter, 2019) λ = 0 .”
- SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spans (2019, background): “999 ) and a decoupled weight decay (Loshchilov and Hutter, 2019) of 0 .”
- Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Models (2022, methodology): “All were optimized with AdamW [Loshchilov and Hutter, 2018] and ZeRO Stage 1 was used to shard the optimizer state [Rajbhandari et al.”
- Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokens (2021, methodology): “All models are trained using AdamW (Loshchilov and Hutter, 2019) with a weight decay parameter of 0.1.”
- RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embedding (2021, methodology): “We look at several datasets from GLUE, i.e. MRPC Dolan and Brockett [2005], SST-2 Socher et al. [2013], QNLI Rajpurkar et al. [2016], STS-B Al-Natsheh [2017], QQP Chen et al. [2018b] and MNLI Williams et al. [2018].”
- HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Models (2020, methodology): “The optimiser was AdamW (Loshchilov and Hutter, 2019) with a 5e-5 learning rate and a 0.01 weight decay.”
- GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Model (2022, methodology): “We use the AdamW (Loshchilov and Hutter, 2019) optimizer, with beta values of 0.9 and 0.95 respectively, and an epsilon of 1.0E−8.”