Technical report on Conversational Question Answering
By Yingnan Ju, Fubang Zhao, Shijie Chen, Bowen Zheng, Xuefeng Yang, Yunfeng Liu. 2019
50 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Conversational Question Answering is a challenging task since it requires understanding of conversational history. In this project, we propose a new system RoBERTa + AT +KD, which involves rationale tagging multi-task, adversarial training, knowledge distillation and a linguistic post-process strategy. Our single model achieves 90.4(F1) on the CoQA test set without data augmentation, outperforming the current state-of-the-art single model by 2.6% F1.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Evaluation & Benchmarks
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Natural Language Processing
In Evaluation & Benchmarks
Citations in the corpus
- Pre-trained models for natural language processing: A survey (2020, neutral): “[78] proposed a “PTM+Adversarial Training+Rationale Tagging+Knowledge Distillation” model.”
- UnitedQA: A Hybrid Approach for Open Domain Question Answering (2021, background): “…first, we add a group of attention bias parameters into the decoder cross-attention block to feature the ranking information of retrieved contexts; second, we add the adversarial training (Ju et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2020; Pereira et al., 2021) to improve the model generalization ability.”
- RikiNet: Reading Wikipedia Pages for Natural Question Answering (2020, background): “With the progress of large-scale pre-trained language models (Devlin et al., 2018), state-of-the-art MRC models (Ju et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2019; Lan et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019) have already surpassed human-level performance on certain commonly used MRC benchmark…”
- Addressing Semantic Drift in Generative Question Answering with Auxiliary Extraction (2021, background): “We then calculate the averaged cross entropy, similar to(Ju et al., 2019), for the rationale extraction loss: (2) where N is the number of input tokens. y ri is the rationale label for the i th token, and L RE j represents the rationale loss for the j th example in the training set.”