Knowledge Processes and Ontologies
By Steffen Staab, Rudi Studer, H. Schnurr, York Sure-Vetter. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2001
917 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Information Systems, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d05ab46e3650c34667c7d7db30b6917f623ae706
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Ljiljana Stojanović
- M. Suárez-Figueroa
- Mariano Fernández-López
- H. Sofia Pinto
- Asunción Gómez-Pérez
- João Pavão Martins
- Óscar Corcho
- Boris Motik
In Management Information Systems
- H. Sofia Pinto
- João Pavão Martins
- M. Suárez-Figueroa
- Asunción Gómez-Pérez
- Steffen Staab
- Alexander Maedche
- Christoph Tempich
In Molecular Biology
- Ljiljana Stojanović
- H. Sofia Pinto
- Mariano Fernández-López
- Óscar Corcho
- João Pavão Martins
- Steffen Staab
- Asunción Gómez-Pérez
- Sören Auer
Citations in the corpus
- OntoWiki: A Tool for Social, Semantic Collaboration (2006, background): “Due being based on a rather static methodology [14] it focuses less on spontaneous, incremental enhancements of the knowledge base than OntoWiki.”
- OOPS! (OntOlogy Pitfall Scanner!): An On-line Tool for Ontology Evaluation (2014, methodology): “The correct application of ontology development methodologies (e.g., METHONTOLOGY (Fernández-López et al., 1999), On-ToKnowledge (Staab et al., 2001), DILIGENT (Pinto, Tempich, & Staab, 2004), or the NeOn DOI: 10.4018/ijswis.2014040102 Copyright © 2014, IGI Global.”
- Ontology Engineering in a Networked World (2012, neutral): “Such methodological guidelines are based on the use of the so-called competency questions (CQs) (Gr€uninger and Fox 1995) and are inspired by how methodologies for building ontologies propose to perform the ontology requirements specification activity (Staab et al. 2001; Uschold 1996; Noy and McGuin”
- Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies: Where is their meeting point? (2003, background): “Some years later, the On-To-Knowledge methodology appeared as a result of the project with the same name [62].”
- User-Driven Ontology Evolution Management (2002, background): “This variety of causes and consequences of the ontology changes makes ontology evolution a very complex operation that should be considered as both, an organizational and a technical process [ 25 ].”
- Ontologies: How can They be Built? (2004, methodology): “Although there are other methodologies proposed in the OE literature, such as (Staab et al. 2001) or (Holsapple and Joshi 2002), some for distributed teams, so far, none of the proposed methodologies is mature enough or has a significant user community.”
- Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web (2002, neutral): “[11] P.”
- DILIGENT: Towards a fine-grained methodology for Distributed, Loosely-controlled and evolving Engineering of oNTologies (2004, methodology): “With the arrival of ontologies in knowledge-based systems the same kind of methodological achievement for structuring the ontologyengineering process has been pursued by approaches like [3] [13] [15] and their application has been proposed in such areas as the Semantic Web, too.”