Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies: Where is their meeting point?

By Óscar Corcho, Mariano Fernández-López, Asunción Gómez-Pérez. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2003

875 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efeef3209320324117600d29f3c85ed69cae8dc1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Andrew Burton-Jones
2. Jakob Beetz
3. Veda C. Storey
4. Vijayan Sugumaran
5. Jos van Leeuwen
6. Punit Ahluwalia
7. B. Vries

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Jakob Beetz
2. Vijayan Sugumaran
3. Jos van Leeuwen
4. B. Vries

In Information Systems

1. Andrew Burton-Jones
2. Jakob Beetz
3. Veda C. Storey
4. Vijayan Sugumaran
5. Jos van Leeuwen
6. Punit Ahluwalia
7. B. Vries

Citations in the corpus

• IfcOWL: A case of transforming EXPRESS schemas into ontologies (2008, methodology): “To achieve this, several new methods and technologies are being actively developed, existing ones adapted, and almost forgotten ones resurrected (Lassila & McGuiness, 2001; Corcho et al., 2003).”
• A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies (2005, methodology): “creation. However, there is currently no accepted way to develop ontologies [ 7 , 25].”