The Effects of Stereotype Threat and Double-Minority Status on the Test Performance of Latino Women

By Patricia M. Gonzales, Hart Blanton, Kevin J. Williams. 2002

520 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf9a445375ccf27ff8bf04973452b2e4ccfe7b6c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Alexandr Lesko
2. Jennifer Henderlong Corpus
3. Michael Johns
4. Jessi L. Smith
5. T. Schmader
6. Elizabeth C. Pinel
7. Li-Ching Hung
8. Cary Stacy Smith

In Social Psychology

1. Jeanett Castellanos
2. T. Schmader
3. Emanuele Castano
4. Jennifer Henderlong Corpus
5. Alexandr Lesko
6. Bettina Spencer
7. Alberta M. Gloria
8. A. Eagly

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jennifer Henderlong Corpus
2. Alexandr Lesko
3. Jessi L. Smith
4. Ryan P. Brown
5. T. Schmader
6. Michael Johns
7. Elizabeth C. Pinel
8. A. Eagly

Citations in the corpus

• Social Class is Dead. Long Live Social Class! Stereotype Threat among Low Socioeconomic Status Individuals (2007, result): “As in previous studies (e.g., Gonzales, Blanton, & Williams, 2002; Steele & Aronson, 1995), and following recent discussions on covariance models (Yzerbyt, Muller, & Judd, 2004), we entered as a covariate the SAT score as well as its product with Diagnosticity and Income.4”
• Stereotype threat: effects on education (2008, background): “Performance deficits concerning Blacks and stereotypes were found on verbal tests (Steele and Aronson 1995), individuals with lower income on verbal tests (Croizet and Claire 1998), Latino students on spatial ability tasks ( Gonzales et al. 2002 ), athletes on sports-related tasks (Stone et al. 1999”
• Intersectional Invisibility: The Distinctive Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple Subordinate-Group Identities (2008, methodology): “Given that evidence can be cited to support both the double jeopardy hypothesis (Berdahl and Moore 2006; Gonzales et al. 2002) and the SMTH (Sidanius and Pratto 1999), the debate about whether members of multiple subordinate groups (e.g., African-American women, lesbians) are ultimately worse off…”
• The Potential Roles of Self‐Fulfilling Prophecies, Stigma Consciousness, and Stereotype Threat in Linking Latino/a Ethnicity and Educational Outcomes (2010, background): “Gonzales et al. (2002) found that Latinas who were under stereotype threat conditions exhibited the greatest performance decrement of any group, suffering a greater decrease in performance than did Latino men.”
• Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. (2003, background): “Both Latinos and Whites indicated on a 7-point scale that they were fairly unconcerned (Ms 2) that the researcher would evaluate their performance in terms of their ethnicity.”