What we know (and need to know) about assessing forgiveness constructs.

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluation of the psychometric properties of two forgiveness scales (2001, background): “McCullough, Hoyt, and Rachal (2000) outlined a 3 X 2 X 4 taxonomy for categorizing current forgiveness measures.”
The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure (2010, background): “Liden et al. (2008) touch upon stewardship with their concepts ‘creating value for the community’ and ‘conceptual skills’, but ignore the important aspects of accountability and courage.”
An Investigation of Forgiveness-seeking Communication and Relational Outcomes (2005, methodology): “For example, Metts (1994) used rules theories to explain how relational transgressions are assessed and new relational agreements are constructed.”