Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua
By S. Pagiola, E. Ramírez, José Gobbi, C. D. Haan, M. Ibrahim, E. Murgueitio, Juan Pablo Ruíz. 2007
307 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Forestry, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf6dcd91f309ccb452d592e0c246cee5f36b8f0f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Forestry
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Toward effective nature conservation on farmland: making farmers matter (2013, result): “Although more data on the ecological, social, and economic implications of this approach is needed, initial results look promising (e.g., Musters et al. 2001; Pagiola et al. 2007; Zabel & Holm-Műller 2008).”
- Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua (2008, background): “Nevertheless, the Project’s limited conditionality may well affect the long-term viability of the mechanism at this site, as we discuss in more detail in a separate paper (Pagiola et al., 2007).”
- Effect of land management and Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC trees on soil microbial community and enzymatic activities in intensive silvopastoral systems of Colombia (2012, background): “…sequestration, mprove soil physicochemical properties, protect watersheds and oils from erosion and contribute to increase biological diversity nd agriculture sustainability (Pagiola et al., 2007; Nair et al., 2009; iraldo et al., 2010; Moç o et al., 2010; Vallejo et al., 2010; Yadav t al., 2011).”
- Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries (2013, methodology): “In contrast to national PES programs in Costa Rica and Mexico, where participants are paid solely for adopting the contracted land use change, RISEMP participants are remunerated according to gained ESI points and thus according to the level of additional ES provided (Pagiola et al., 2007).”
- Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues (2008, background): “For example, Roberts and Lubowski (2007) find that temporary cropland retirement payments under the U.”
- A Strategy for Scaling-Up Intensive Silvopastoral Systems in Colombia (2013, methodology): “Funded by The Global Environment Facility and administered by the World Bank, the project took place between 2002 and 2007 in three regions of Colombia, Costa Rica, and Nicaragua (Calle, 2008; Calle et al., 2009; Murgueitio et al., 2005, Pagiola et al., 2007).”
- Water funds and payments for ecosystem services: practice learns from theory and theory can learn from practice (2012, background): “PES schemes have received considerable attention (Landell-Mills & Porras, 2002; Pagiola et al., 2002, 2007; Jack et al., 2008; Sommerville et al., 2009; Farley & Costanza, 2010) analysing both their theory and practice and the appeal and drawbacks of market creation (Goldman & Tallis, 2009; Daniels…”
- Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global (2010, background): “This is particularly problematic in light of the fact that PES schemes rarely have permanent sources of funding (Pagiola et al., 2007).”
- Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries (2008, background): “Pagiola et al. (2007b) show that, contrary to conventional wisdom, areas that are important for water services are not necessarily high poverty areas.”
- Payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services for sustained on-farm utilization of plant and animal genetic resources (2011, background): “Similarly, contracting a few large farmers rather than many small ones could also be a strategy to reduce transaction costs (as per Pagiola et al., 2007).”