Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies

575 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Which questions are most difficult to understand?: The comprehension of Wh questions in three subtypes of SLI (2011, methodology): “(BAFLA ST-TLAT, described in Friedmann et al., 2009, in press, in Nave et al., 2009, and in Haddad-Hanna and Friedmann, 2009).”
Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children's comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian (2012, background): “…the difference between adults and children with respect to the computation of the locality principle can be expressed as in (13) ((29) in Friedmann et al., 2009), capitalizing on the featural approach to Relativized Minimality as developed in Starke (2001), and Rizzi (2004) (X = the…”
Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian (2016, background): “Second, intervention effects for complex wh-phrases have been observed to be different from intervention effects with bare wh-words, at least in child grammar (see Friedmann et al. 2009).”
The Movement Derivation of Conditional Clauses (2010, background): “…to which a constituent with a feature blocks extraction of a constituent with the same feature in its c-command domain (see, e.g., Rizzi 2004, Friedmann, Belletti, and Rizzi 2009), this implementation of the movement approach to conditional clauses leads to the prediction that such clauses…”