Does innovativeness matter for international competitiveness in developing countries?: The case of Turkish manufacturing industries

By Emre Özçelik, Erol Taymaz. 2004

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

I. Introduction. - II. Evolution of the Theory of International Trade: Attitudes towards the Technology Factor and the Schumpeterian Viewpoint as a Rationale for Studies at the Firm-Level. - III. A Survey of Firm-Level Studies on the Determinants of Export Performance with an Emphasis on Technology Factor. - IV. Technological and International Competitveness of the Turkish Manufacturing Industry. - V. Determinants of International Competitveness: Estimation Results. - VI. Concluding Remarks.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf0f7a4839e7da1c7de4ba1862ff468ec234c22e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Examining the Effect of Market Orientation On Innovativeness (2006, background): “Similarly, innovativeness is seen as a lever to raise living standards and improve international competitiveness (Özçelik and Taymaz 2004).”
Comparing Innovation Capability of Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises: Examining the Effects of Organizational Culture and Empowerment (2010, background): “The existence of innovative and internationally competitive SMEs is a critical requirement for countries’ future growth and prosperity (Özçelik and Taymaz 2004).”
Innovation and integration in the agri-food industry (2009, result): “Our results tend to agree with that of trade theorist’s (Krugman, 1979; Vernon, 1966) and empirical results from other industries (Özçelik and Taymaz, 2004; Basile, 2001; Lachenmaier and Woessmann, 2006).”
R&D support programs in developing countries: The Turkish experience (2008, background): “Even though Turkey has an “infant” national system of innovation, its manufacturing industry is relatively productive and technologically dynamic (see Özçelik and Taymaz, 2004).”
Influence of CEO characteristics in family firms internationalization (2017, methodology): “Consequently, the most appropriate way of obtaining unbiased and consistent estimators is the Tobit estimation procedure (Özçelik & Taymaz, 2004) due to the Tobit technique enables us to address particular consideration to the extreme scores.”
Do R&D tax incentives work? Firm-level evidence from China (2017, background): “…economies has been widely studied, but little evidence has been generated on the effects of tax incentives on firm R& D expenditure in developing countries (one exception is Özçelik and Taymaz (2004), who find a positive effect of R & D tax incentives for Turkish manufacturing firms8).”
Innovation and Economic Development (2009, background): “Özçelik and Taymaz (2004), de Araújo (2007), Chudnovsky, et al. (2007) and Correa, et al (2007) found positive and statistically significant correlations between innovation and exports in Argentina, Brazil, Turkey, but not in Ecuador.”
The regional and global competitiveness of multinational firms (2012, background): “In addition, most of the literature measuring international competitiveness focuses on firms from a country or region (e.g., Buckley et al. 1990; Coviello et al. 1998; Doyle and Wong 1998; Özçelik and Taymaz 2004; Traill and da Silva 1996) and thus ignores country (region) specific factors.”
The Form of Relationship between Firm-Level Product Innovativeness and New Product Performance in Developed and Emerging Markets (2015, background): “Second, given that innovation capabilities, as valuable and socially complex resources (Hult and Ketchen, 2001), affect firm-level competitiveness, focusing on the firm-level allows an understanding of how firms’ capabilities differ and how these differences affect performance (Özçelik and Taymaz, 2”