Regional Variation in the Use of Sarcasm

By Megan L. Dress, Roger Kreuz, Kristen E. Link, Gina M. Caucci. 2008

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cec7e23f10a9bf620b84f3e1165cc9a59fa82ee2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Andrea Bowes
2. Albert N. Katz
3. Ashwin Rajadesingan
4. Reza Zafarani
5. Huan Liu
6. John D. Campbell
7. Penny M. Pexman

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Albert N. Katz
2. Andrea Bowes

In Social Psychology

1. Andrea Bowes
2. Ashwin Rajadesingan
3. Reza Zafarani
4. Huan Liu
5. Albert N. Katz

Citations in the corpus

• When Sarcasm Stings (2011, methodology): “To assess gender differences and remain comparable to Dress et al. (2008), two lines of dialogue in this study were left blank for participants to complete what they thought came next in conversation.”
• Sarcasm Detection on Twitter: A Behavioral Modeling Approach (2015, background): “Further, it has been shown that people in different regions perceive and use sarcasm differently (see Dress et al.’s study [5]).”