A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden

By Björn A. Sandén, K. Hillman. 2011

224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms (2015, background): “…understanding of technology dynamics, which could also be used to derive policies to hinder the development of the focal technology. technologies (Sandén and Hillman, 2011), reactions of incumbents (Smink et al., 2015), political strategies (Wesseling et al., 2014) and decline of socio-technical…”
Lock-in and path dependence: an evolutionary approach to eco-innovations (2014, background): “For example, the overlap between biogas and ethanol increased the resources available for biogas, which captured funding directed to ethanol (Sandén and Hillman 2011: 411).”
Revisiting carbon lock-in in energy systems: Explaining the perpetuation of coal power in Japan (2020, background): “oblige or encourage actors to follow particular trajectories with regard to investments, decisions and technological development [41].”
The role of lock-in mechanisms in transition processes: The case of energy for road transport (2015, unknown): “It is argued that the different elements of such a complex system – the material, organisational and conceptual dimensions of the system (Sandén and Hillman, 2011) – are aligned with each other.”