The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape

By Ilkka Hanski, Otso Ovaskainen. Nature, 2000

1,154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cebc9e5680490f2fb8b011cbc82c12ef0e1b01ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns (2008, background): “…focus on a single species or small set of species and a single economic activity such as forestry (e.g., Montgomery et al., 1994; Haight, 1995; Hof and Bevers, 1998; Marshall et al., 2000; Calkin et al., 2002; Moilanen and Cabeza , 2002; Nalle et al., 2004; Strange et al., 2006a,b; Holzkamper…”
Bryophytes in a changing landscape: The hierarchical effects of habitat fragmentation on ecological and evolutionary processes (2007, background): “…habitats as an equilibrium between extinction and immigration (MacArthur and Wilson, 1967), is the foundation from which metapopulation theory began exploring the dynamics of population persistence in fragmented habitats (Levins, 1969; Hanski and Gilpin, 1997; Hanski and Ovaskainen, 2000).”
A Graph‐Theory Framework for Evaluating Landscape Connectivity and Conservation Planning (2008, neutral): “Although other methods of measuring habitat connectivity may be more appropriate for specific research questions (e.g., metapopulation capacity [Hanski & Ovaskainen 2000] for predicting population persistence across an entire landscape), graph theory may be preferable for many applications.”
Assessing functional connectivity using empirical data (2008, background): “…ð4Þ The element of mij gives the contribution that patch j makes to the colonization rate of patch i, multiplied by the expected lifetime of patch i. mij thus measures the fraction of time that patch i would be occupied if patch j were the only source of immigrants (Hanski and Ovaskainen 2000).”
Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly (2002, background): “The theoretical framework for the study of metapopulation dynamics in static patch networks has been well established in the past few years (Hanski 1994, 1999b, Hanski and Gilpin 1997, Moilanen et al. 1998, Hanski and Ovaskainen 2000).”
Extinction threshold in metapopulation models (2003, methodology): “1) as a description of the metapopulation consequences of habitat loss are in the spirit of the occupancy-number model (Nee 1994, Hanski et al. 1996, Carlson 2000, Hanski & Ovaskainen 2000).”
Synthesis of pattern and process in biodiversity conservation assessment: a flexible whole‐landscape modelling framework (2010, background): “…more extensively, has involved adapting metapopulation-capacity modelling, originally designed to assess landscapes of discrete habitat patches (Hanski & Ovaskainen, 2000), to instead operate with gridded surfaces of continuously varying habitat-quality and movement-permeability (Drielsma &…”
Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements (2018, background): “Single species or single site studies have shown the severe effects of reduced vagility on these processes (27, 28).”
CONSERVING SPECIES IN A WORKING LANDSCAPE: LAND USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES (2005, background): “…such as the availability of prey, predation risk, and dispersal barriers (e.g., highways) are also important factors in explaining dispersal (e.g., Hanski and Ovaskainen 2000, August 2005 1399LAND USE, CONSERVATION, AND ECONOMICS Goodwin and Fahrig 2002, Baguette et al. 2003, Gardner and…”
Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale (2007, background): “Additionally, even if habitat fragments are large enough to support a species in the short term, they may be too far apart to ensure regional persistence through local extinction-colonization dynamics (Hanski, 1994; Hanski and Ovaskainen, 2000).”
Dispersal and gene flow of Populus nigra (Salicaceae) along a dynamic river system (2003, background): “Habitat loss therefore leads to an important decrease in patch occupancy, and thus in metapopulation viability (Hanski & Ovaskainen 2000; Casagrandi & Gatto 2002).”
The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review (2009, background): “Hanski and Ovaskainen (2000) demonstrate how removal and addition of patches affects metapopulation capacity.”