Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly

By N. Wahlberg, T. Klemetti, Ilkka Hanski. 2002

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08aa9b960389ac8a3bb24d083338f7f0869106f6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Survival, movement, and resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodius (2004, background): “Wahlberg et al. (2002a) found that the most important variables explaining the presence of Euphydryas aurinia in Finland were patch area and the density of host plants.”
Landscape occupancy and local population size depends on host plant distribution in the butterfly Cupido minimus (2004, unknown): “Studies in the UK and Finland show that the occurrence of some butterfly species is significantly affected by habitat area, habitat isolation and habitat quality (e.g., Thomas et al., 1992, 2001; Wahlberg et al., 2002).”
Ecology of butterflies in Europe (2009, background): “, 2007), ii) Habitat patch metrics like patch area (e.g. Thomas et al., 2001; Wahlberg et al., 2002; Fred & Brommer, 2003), iii) Metrics considering the functional spatial configuration of habitat patches depicting habitat connectivity (e.”
Integrating Landscape and Metapopulation Modeling Approaches: Viability of the Sharp‐Tailed Grouse in a Dynamic Landscape (2004, background): “…1998; Gaff et al. 2000; Johst et al. 2002; Keith 2004; Kindvall & Bergman 2004) or by considering types of patches based on occupancy and suitability and modeling the transitions between these types as stochastic events (Keymer et al. 2000; Amarasekare & Possingham 2001; Wahlberg et al. 2002).”
Relative importance of resource quantity, isolation and habitat quality for landscape distribution of a monophagous butterfly (2005, background): “…area and isolation of fragments are in the focus of metapopulation studies (Thomas et al. 1992, Hanski 1994), and most studies also include effects of habitat quality (Hanski et al. 1994, Eber and Brandl 1996, Hjermann and Ims 1996, Dennis and Eales 1997, Thomas et al. 2001, Wahlberg et al. 2002).”
Inferring dispersal: a Bayesian approach to phylogeny‐based island biogeography, with special reference to the Canary Islands (2008, background): “This involves an extinction probability (Ei=e/Ai) that is an inverse function of the population size of the receiving patch i, which in turn is assumed to be proportional to the area of the patch, Ai (Wahlberg et al., 2002).”
Species in a dynamic world: Consequences of habitat network dynamics on conservation planning (2012, background): “Of course, biodiversity patterns are generally shaped by natural processes in succession, species interactions and catastrophic events such as floods and fires, and many species can adapt to these processes (e.g. Meulebrouck et al., 2007; Stelter et al., 1997; Wahlberg et al., 2002).”
Metapopulation dynamics and conservation of the marsh fritillary butterfly: Population viability analysis and management options for a critically endangered species in Western Europe (2005, methodology): “The comparison with two other studies (Wahlberg et al., 2002b; Wang et al., 2004), investigating dispersal in the same species with the same model, indicated that parameter estimates were globally similar.”
Intensive game keeping, coppicing and butterflies: The story of Milovicky Wood, Czech Republic (2006, background): “In contrast, modern high-forest management creates shady conditions unsuitable for open-forest species (Warren and Key, 1991; Greatorex-Davies et al., 1993; Wahlberg et al., 2002; Freese et al., 2006; Liegl and Dolek, 2006).”
Habitat models and habitat connectivity analysis for butterflies and burnet moths - The example of Zygaena carniolica and Coenonympha arcania (2005, background): “In addition to habitat quality, species occurrence probability is also influenced by spatial factors, like isolation and patch size affecting spatial population dynamics (Thomas et al., 1992, 2001; Hanski and Gilpin, 1997; Wahlberg et al., 2002).”
Spatial occurrence and colonisations in patch‐tracking metapopulations: local conditions versus dispersal (2003, result): “Empirical studies of different organism groups have supported this model (Paine and Levin 1981, Overton 1996, Quintana- Ascencio and Menges 1996, Nilsson 1997, Stelter et al. 1997, Wahlberg et al. 2002).”
Colonization-extinction dynamics of an epiphyte metapopulation in a dynamic landscape (2005, background): “In empirical studies where patch destruction has been seen to cause local extinctions, the local extinction rate is still primarily set by stochastic extinctions within intact patches (Sjögren-Gulve 1994, Nilsson 1997, Stelter et al. 1997, Wahlberg et al. 2002).”
The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review (2009, background): “…retain fewer immigrants whilst larger ones capture and maintain more (e.g. Hill et al. 1996; Kuussaari et al. 1996; Shreeve et al. 1996; Sutcliffe et al. 1997a; Kéry et al. 2001; Petit et al. 2001; Wahlberg et al. 2002a, b; Ovaskainen 2004; Hovestadt and Poethke 2006; Schtickzelle et al. 2006).”
Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure – the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies (2003, background): “‘Suitable’ host plants were defined on the basis of female oviposition preferences (cf. Thomas et al. 2001; Wahlberg et al. 2002a) measured in the previous section as large host plant individuals in sunny exposure with unrestricted access to leaves.”