Web-CAT: automatically grading programming assignments

By S. Edwards, Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2008

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ceb551ea93292f5cb307ac2ae8f47dce510fa494

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Petri Ihantola
2. Otto Seppälä
3. Ville Karavirta
4. Tuukka Ahoniemi
5. Claudia Szabo

In Computer Science Applications

1. Petri Ihantola
2. Ville Karavirta
3. Tuukka Ahoniemi
4. Otto Seppälä
5. Claudia Szabo

In Media Technology

1. Petri Ihantola
2. Otto Seppälä
3. Ville Karavirta
4. Tuukka Ahoniemi

Citations in the corpus

• Review of recent systems for automatic assessment of programming assignments (2010, methodology): “This is supported in Web-Cat [16], for example.”
• Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics in Programming: Literature Review and Case Studies (2015, methodology): “Finally, in addition to web-based practice problem systems, assessment tools, and IDE-based data collection, many System Languages Client/Instrumentation Blackbox [18] Java BlueJ/line edits CloudCoder [84] C/C++, Java, Python, Ruby online ide/keystrokes CodeWorkout [38] Java, Python, Ruby online ide”