Influenza Virus: Immunity and Vaccination Strategies. Comparison of the Immune Response to Inactivated and Live, Attenuated Influenza Vaccines

By R. Cox, K. Brokstad, P. Ogra. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 2004

597 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Immunology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce7cd8629c0c910257a7b3883d033e4a3aaebbbb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

1. Simon Cauchemez
2. Neil M. Ferguson

In Immunology

1. I. Salinas
2. J. Sunyer
3. C. Czerkinsky
4. J. Holmgren
5. M. Esteban

Citations in the corpus

• Mucosal immunity and vaccines (2005, background): “This vaccine induces an immune response that more closely resembles natural immunity than the response elicited by the injectable vaccin”
• Mucosal immunoglobulins and B cells of Teleost fish (2011, background): “Live microorganisms (infections) or vaccines that use live attenuated pathogens are more effective inducers of mucosal responses than their inactivated counterparts in mammalian studies (Cox et al., 2004; Levine and Kaper, 1995).”
• Time lines of infection and disease in human influenza: a review of volunteer challenge studies. (2008, background): “Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity is responsible for viral clearance and recovery from infection (71).”