Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Ly-\alpha\ forest of BOSS quasars

By N. Busca, T. Delubac, J. Rich, S. Bailey, A. Font-Ribera, David Kirkby, J. Goff, M. Pieri, A. Slosar, 'Eric Aubourg and 52 more. 2012

410 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We report a detection of the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature in the three-dimensional correlation function of the transmitted flux fraction in the \Lya forest of high-redshift quasars. The study uses 48,640 quasars in the redshift range $2.1\le z \le 3.5$ from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) of the third generation of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-III). At a mean redshift $z=2.3$, we measure the monopole and quadrupole components of the correlation function for separations in the range $20\hMpc<r<200\hMpc$. A peak in the correlation function is seen at a separation equal to $(1.01\pm0.03)$ times the distance expected for the BAO peak within a concordance $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. This first detection of the BAO peak at high redshift, when the universe was strongly matter dominated, results in constraints on the angular diameter distance $\da$ and the expansion rate $H$ at $z=2.3$ that, combined with priors on $H_0$ and the baryon density, require the existence of dark energy. Combined with constraints derived from Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) observations, this result implies $H(z=2.3)=(224\pm8){\rm km\,s^{-1}Mpc^{-1}}$, indicating that the time derivative of the cosmological scale parameter $\dot{a}=H(z=2.3)/(1+z)$ is significantly greater than that measured with BAO at $z\sim0.5$. This demonstrates that the expansion was decelerating in the range $0.7<z<2.3$, as expected from the matter domination during this epoch. Combined with measurements of $H_0$, one sees the pattern of deceleration followed by acceleration characteristic of a dark-energy dominated universe.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce078b10e714cbb08730416dbc10737d5fe5811b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Schneider
  2. Will J. Percival
  3. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. D. M. Alexander
  6. P. Hopkins
  7. K. Dawson
  8. C. Yéche

In Instrumentation

  1. D. Schneider
  2. Will J. Percival
  3. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  4. D. M. Alexander
  5. A. Ross
  6. David Schlegel
  7. K. Dawson
  8. John Moustakas

Citations in the corpus