Target Selection and Validation of DESI Quasars

By E. Chaussidon, C. Yéche, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, D. M. Alexander, Jinyi Yang, S. Ahlen, S. Bailey, D. Brooks, Zheng Cai, S. Chabanier and 47 more. Astrophysical Journal, 2022

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) survey will measure large-scale structures using quasars as direct tracers of dark matter in the redshift range 0.9 < z < 2.1 and using Lyα forests in quasar spectra at z > 2.1. We present several methods to select candidate quasars for DESI, using input photometric imaging in three optical bands (g, r, z) from the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys and two infrared bands (W1, W2) from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer. These methods were extensively tested during the Survey Validation of DESI. In this paper, we report on the results obtained with the different methods and present the selection we optimized for the DESI main survey. The final quasar target selection is based on a random forest algorithm and selects quasars in the magnitude range of 16.5 < r < 23. Visual selection of ultra-deep observations indicates that the main selection consists of 71% quasars, 16% galaxies, 6% stars, and 7% inconclusive spectra. Using the spectra based on this selection, we build an automated quasar catalog that achieves a fraction of true QSOs higher than 99% for a nominal effective exposure time of ∼1000 s. With a 310 deg−2 target density, the main selection allows DESI to select more than 200 deg−2 quasars (including 60 deg−2 quasars with z > 2.1), exceeding the project requirements by 20%. The redshift distribution of the selected quasars is in excellent agreement with quasar luminosity function predictions.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e06336f704c320a857867577195aba645edb7349

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Schneider
  2. Will J. Percival
  3. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  4. J. Tinker
  5. D. Weinberg
  6. M. White
  7. L. Hernquist
  8. Simon D. M. White

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Risa Wechsler
  2. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  3. D. Weinberg
  4. Carlos S. Frenk
  5. Adam D. Myers
  6. C. Rockosi
  7. D. M. Alexander
  8. Ray Sharples

Citations in the corpus