A Meta‐Analysis of Common Factor and Specific Treatment Effects Across the Outcome Domains of the Phase Model of Psychotherapy

By Sean E. Stevens, M. T. Hynan, Mike Allen. 2006

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce03a21fee5c0f0312209878db27a8dc6e6771cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Drisko
2. S. Messer
3. B. Wampold
4. J. Norcross
5. K. Chwalisz
6. A. Practice
7. S. Timimi
8. K. Bhati

In Social Psychology

1. B. Wampold
2. J. Drisko

Citations in the corpus

• Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcome: Meta-Analytic Findings and Their Implications for Practice and Research (2004, methodology): “Sixth, research on psychotherapy should include attention to component models of therapy research (Kazdin, 1994; Stevens et al., 2000; Wampold, 2001).”
• Let's Face Facts: Common Factors Are More Potent Than Specific Therapy Ingredients (2006, background): “Although some interaction groups presumably controlling for “common factors” in the studies of comparative psychotherapy effects metaanalyzed by Stevens, Hynan, and Allen (2000).”