The Sullying Effect of Recessions
By Gadi Barlevy. 2002
292 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce012f69eab268d1748a3be298ac6e006d59af2b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Peter Gal
- Chiara Criscuolo
- Jeremy Lise
- Giuseppe Berlingieri
- Sara Calligaris
- John C. Haltiwanger
- C. Menon
- Toshihiko Mukoyama
Citations in the corpus
- Reallocation in the Great Recession: Cleansing or Not? (2016, background): “Barlevy ð2002Þ focuses on worker matching issues as other possible reasons recessions can have sullying effects.”
- The Macrodynamics of Sorting between Workers and Firms (2013, background): “For simplicity, we assume that separations and meetings occur sequentially after the realization of the aggregate productivity shock: separations first, then the unemployed and the surviving employees 3See related work by Barlevy (2002); Sahin, Song, Topa, and Violante (2014) among others.”
- Efficient Search on the Job and the Business Cycle (2011, unknown): “(2) and (3), d : Z → [δ, 1], θu ∈ [0, θ], θe : Z → [0, θ], cu : Z → [0, 1], ce : Z × Z → [0, 1].”
- Entry, Exit and Plant-Level Dynamics over the Business Cycle (2008, background): “Given the value function V c(s′, n), conditions (3) and (4) pin down the values of cq and ce, given ν(q) and the equilibrium value of q ∗ that we target.”
- The Dynamics of Employment Growth: New Evidence from 18 Countries (2014, background): “As highlighted in more recent theoretical and empirical contributions, recessions might not be cleansing processes but they might rather produce long-term scarring effects, especially in the presence of distortions (Barlevy, 2002 and Ouyang, 2009; Caballero and Hammour, 2005).”
- The Multiprod project: A comprehensive overview (2017, background): “2002; Bartelsman et al. 2004, 2009). The reallocation is not only driven by the exit of shrinking firms and the entry of new firms, but also by the constant upscaling and downscaling of incumbents, a churning that can significantly contribute to aggregate productivity growth. The extent of the contr”
- Cyclical Job Ladders by Firm Size and Firm Wage (2018, unknown): “As hypothesized by Moscarini and Postel-Vinay (2009, 2013), during slack markets, when there is less competition for workers, firms at the bottom of the job ladder can more easily retain workers who ordinarily would have been poached away.(5) However, little is known about the direction and cyclical”