Matching conditions in the quasicontinuum method: Removal of the error introduced at the interface between the coarse-grained and fully atomistic region

By T. Shimokawa, J. Mortensen, J. Schiøtz, Karsten Wedel Jacobsen. 2004

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce00953df213ed914c9029e0b3318277d41c6116

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Markus J. Buehler
2. Oral Büyüköztürk
3. Ronald E. Miller
4. Ellad B. Tadmor
5. Jacob Fish
6. W. A. Curtin
7. Zheng Yuan
8. V. Shenoy

In Computational Mechanics

1. Ellad B. Tadmor
2. Ronald E. Miller

In Materials Chemistry

1. Oral Büyüköztürk
2. Markus J. Buehler
3. Ronald E. Miller
4. Ellad B. Tadmor
5. W. A. Curtin
6. Harold S. Park
7. Jacob Fish
8. Serge Prudhomme

Citations in the corpus

• A unified framework and performance benchmark of fourteen multiscale atomistic/continuum coupling methods (2009, methodology): “Several authors have since then devoted considerable time to discussing the source and nature of these ghost forces [9, 49, 14, 5, 12].”
• Structural solution using molecular dynamics: Fundamentals and a case study of epoxy-silica interface (2011, background): “…one of the earliest methods to deal with this problem, initially applied to crystalline materials such as metals (Tadmor et al., 1996; Shenoy et al., 1998; Shenoy et al., 1999; Knap and Ortiz, 2001; Miller and Tadmor, 2002; Curtin and Miller, 2003; Shimokawa et al., 2004; Miller and Tadmor, 2007).”