A unified framework and performance benchmark of fourteen multiscale atomistic/continuum coupling methods
By Ronald E. Miller, Ellad B. Tadmor. 2009
415 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26afca3fc5bf202cff1950b7f4278c34b6a0efa2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Pierre Kerfriden
- Stéphane P.A. Bordas
- Timon Rabczuk
- Samir Beneddine
- Pablo Seleson
- Serge Prudhomme
- Ellad B. Tadmor
- N. Admal
In Materials Chemistry
- Timon Rabczuk
- Serge Prudhomme
- Pierre Kerfriden
- Pablo Seleson
- Samir Beneddine
- N. Admal
- Stéphane P.A. Bordas
- Mohammad Silani
In Mechanics of Materials
- Timon Rabczuk
- Stéphane P.A. Bordas
- Pierre Kerfriden
- Pablo Seleson
- Xiaoying Zhuang
- Trung Nguyen-Thoi
- Hung Nguyen-Xuan
- Samir Beneddine
Citations in the corpus
- A Unified Interpretation of Stress in Molecular Systems (2010, background): “Refer to [48] for a comparison of some prominent atomistic/continuum coupling multiscale methods.”
- A computational library for multiscale modeling of material failure (2013, methodology): “Notable multiscale modeling tools are the one offered by Miller and Tadmor [85] where the open source implementation offers 14 different multiscale methods bridging atomistic to continuum methods.”
- A force-based coupling scheme for peridynamics and classical elasticity (2013, methodology): “Methods attempting to couple nonlocal and local models, particularly, atomistic and continuum ones, inlcuding the Quasicontinuum method [21, 36, 41] and the Arlequin aproach [5, 6, 8, 9], among others, are provided in the literature; for a benchmark study of different atomistic-to-continuum coupling”