ASSESSING EFFECTS OF PREDATION RISK ON FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF MULE DEER

By K. Altendorf, J. Laundré, Carlos A. López González, Joel s. Brown. 2001

332 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdd0486c6526883d28146378ce16f7b0e4164de9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Mapping the Landscape of Fear of the Cape Ground Squirrel (Xerus inauris) (2008, background): “…have higher GUDs in the risky habitat away from trees than in safer areas near trees (Thorson et al. 1998), and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) have higher GUDs along the edges of forests frequented by mountain lions (Puma concolor) than in open areas away from the forest (Altendorf et al. 2001).”
Factors influencing female home range sizes in elk (Cervus elaphus) in North American landscapes (2005, background): “Forest patches are used preferentially in areas of high predation pressure (Wolff and Van Horn 2003; Fortin et al. in press), which permits ungulates to reduce vigilance (Altendorf et al. 2001).”
Tradeoffs between food abundance and predation danger in spatial usage of a stopover site by western sandpipers, Calidris mauri (2006, background): “GUDs offer an effective measure of the cost to an animal foraging under the danger of predation (Brown 1988, Altendorf et al. 2001, Kotler et al. 2004).”
Patch use, apprehension, and vigilance behavior of Nubian Ibex under perceived risk of predation (2006, background): “Altendorf et al. (2001) measured how mule deer (Odocoilues hemionus) allocate their foraging effort while foraging under predation by applying the giving-up densities (GUDs) technique and measuring their vigilance level at feeding trays.”
Large carnivore impacts are context-dependent (2017, background): “…et al. 2010), predation r sk and the avoidance of predators are also believed to be closely linked to how ungulates use time and space (Brown et al. 1999; Harmsen et al. 2011; Kronfeld-Schor and Dayan 2003) as well as how they forage (Altendorf et al. 2001; Kotler et al. 1994; Laundré et al. 2001).”
Delay-induced chaos and its possible control in a seasonally forced eco-epidemiological model with fear effect and predator switching (2021, background): “For example, scared Mule deer opt for lesser foraging to avoid the acute predation risk of mountain lions [4].”
The Landscape of Fear: Ecological Implications of Being Afraid~!2009-09-09~!2009-11-16~!2010-02-02~! (2010, background): “Others have shown that these changes in time allocation are a common response to predation risk (Brown et al. 1994, Altendorf et al. 2001, Brown and Kotler 2004).”
Assessing tiger–prey interactions in Sumatran rainforests (2011, background): “, 2007) and spatial patterns of bighorn sheep, Ovis canadensis, avoiding open habitats that provide greater visibility for pumas, Puma concolor (Altendorf et al., 2001).”
VIGILANCE, PREDATION RISK, AND THE ALLEE EFFECT IN DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP (2004, background): “…risk as determined by body size, presence of young, habitat structure, distance from cover, group size, and position within a group (e.g., Kie 1999, Steenbeek1 E-mail: mikemooring@ptloma.edu et al. 1999, Altendorf et al. 2001, White et al. 2001, Childress and Lung 2003, Wolff and Van Horn 2003).”