Assessing tiger–prey interactions in Sumatran rainforests

By M. Linkie, Martin S. Ridout. 2011

421 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Small Animals, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e6852539192c8aff8116d66f7e048be163c454c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Small Animals

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Puma activity patterns and temporal overlap with prey in a human‐modified landscape at Southeastern Brazil (2018, positive): “We defined multiple records of the same species at the same camera station as independent when pictures were taken at least 30 min apart, unless we were able to unambiguously identify different individuals (Linkie & Ridout, 2011).”
Comparing diel activity patterns of wildlife across latitudes and seasons: Time transformations using day length (2019, background): “…(Rowcliffe, Kays, Kranstauber, Carbone, & Jansen, 2014), and the amount of activity overlap between species has been proposed as a metric to study temporal niche partitioning or predator–prey interactions (Linkie & Ridout, 2011; Oliveira‐Santos, Zucco, & Agostinelli, 2013; Ridout & Linkie, 2009).”
Impacts of People and Tigers on Leopard Spatiotemporal Activity Patterns in a Global Biodiversity Hotspot (2015, methodology): “We used 10000 bootstrap samples to measure ∆̂ 95% confidence intervals (CI) (Linkie and Ridout, 2011).”
Occupancy patterns and niche partitioning within a diverse carnivore community exposed to anthropogenic pressures (2013, methodology): “Coefficients of overlap are calculated nonparametrically using kernel density estimates, and range from 0 (no temporal overlap) to 1 (perfect temporal overlap) (Linkie and Ridout, 2011; Ridout and Linkie, 2009).”
Mesopredator spatial and temporal responses to large predators and human development in the Santa Cruz Mountains of California (2015, methodology): “We used the non-parametric kernel density estimation procedure described in Ridout and Linkie (2009) and Linkie and Ridout (2011) to compare whether 10 species (pumas, bobcats, coyotes, grey foxes, opossums, striped skunks, raccoons, domestic cats, domestic dogs, and humans) offset their temporal…”
Towards good practice guidance in using camera‐traps in ecology: influence of sampling design on validity of ecological inferences (2013, background): “…habitat characteristics, this species occurrence information can also be used to answer behavioural ecology questions (e.g. habitat use, activity patterns, foraging habits; Bowkett, Rovero & Marshall 2007; Bridges & Noss 2011; Linkie & Ridout 2011) at the species level or among species.”