Nest-site limitation and density dependence of reproductive output in the common goldeneye Bucephala clangula: implications for the management of cavity-nesting birds

By H. Pöysä, S. Pöysä. 2002

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd4cf03c8de1e54ab5644984364d1f2dbc9a60e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Gabriel Gaona
2. Y. van der Hoek
3. A. Lõhmus
4. K. Martin
5. Tomasz A Wesolowski
6. Priit Kilgas

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Gabriel Gaona
2. A. Lõhmus
3. Y. van der Hoek
4. K. Martin

Citations in the corpus

• Providing nest boxes for hole-nesting birds – Does habitat matter? (2005, background): “Densitydependent decrease in reproductive output has also been recorded in the common goldeneye Bucephala clangula after nest-box provision (Pöysä and Pöysä 2002).”
• The diversity, distribution and conservation status of the tree‐cavity‐nesting birds of the world (2017, background): “…use tree cavities only rarely, and are unlikely to depend on them for survival, availability of cavities can be an important limiting factor for many other tree- cavity- nesting species or populations (see e.g., Cockle et al., 2011; Cornelius et al., 2008; Pöysä & Pöysä, 2002; Wiebe, 2011).”