Providing nest boxes for hole-nesting birds – Does habitat matter?
By R. Mänd, V. Tilgar, A. Lõhmus, A. Leivits. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2005
174 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Parasitology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd5f029e1b6539e873ebbed7dc8111b7869c8799
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Parasitology
Citations in the corpus
- Blood parameters as indicators of physiological condition and skeletal development in great tits (Parus major): natural variation and application in the reproductive ecology of birds (2007, background): “It is unlikely however that the observed habitat differences in parental condition are the result of a higher number of nestlings in coniferous habitat (Mänd et al. 2005), because the inclusion of the number of nestlings in the models did not change the results (III).”
- Microclimate in tree cavities and nest-boxes: implications for hole-nesting birds (2017, background): “, 50 2009), there is uncertainty as to whether nest-boxes can be considered an adequate 51 functional substitute for tree holes due to apparent variation in the breeding ecology of birds 52 occupying artificial and natural nest-sites (e.g. Czeszczewik et al., 1999; Mänd et al., 2005; 53 Lambrechts e”