Building Programme Evaluation into the Design of Public Research‐Support Programmes

By Adam B. Jaffe. 2002

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd38c15ebf24850bf007923edeba813ad8cdb945

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Is Export Promotion Effective in Developing Countries? Firm-Level Evidence on the Intensive and Extensive Margins of Exports (2008, methodology): “…sample counterpart for the missing information on the outcomes had the firms not been treated when no randomized control groups are available (see, e.g., Heckman et al., 1998; Heckman et al., 1999; Klette et al., 2000; Jaffe, 2002; Blundell and Costa Dias, 2002; Lee, 2005; Smith and Todd, 2005a).”
The Financing of R&D and Innovation (2009, unknown): “Agency costs of the first type may be avoided by reducing the amount of free cash flow available to the managers by leveraging the firm, but this in turn forces them to use the higher cost external funds to finance 4 See Campbell, Lo, and McKinlay (1997) for a descripion of this methodology, which i”
The link between public support and private r&d effort: what is the optimal subsidy? (2011, methodology): “In Catalonia, R&D subsidies are granted by the Catalan public agency in a process similar to international procedures (see Jaffe, 2002 and Tanayama, 2009).”
R&D support programs in developing countries: The Turkish experience (2008, background): “…tax incentives contribute to private R&D (Bloom et al., 2000; Hall and van Reenen, 2000), opposing results have been obtained as to whether publiclyfunded R&D subsidies complement (and “add to”) or substitute (and “crowd out”) private R&D investment (David et al., 2000; Hall, 2002; Jaffe, 2002).”
National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions (2014, background): “Proper evaluation 32 requires that data on project selection and project performance be collected as programs 33 commence and maintained after they are completed (Jaffe, 2002).”
The "Matthew Effect" in R&D Public Subsidies: the Italian Evidence (2013, unknown): “Given that public resources are raised via socially costly revenue mechanisms, society will be worse off if the total R&D investment remains unaltered (Jaffe, 2002).”
The Impact of Public Funds on Private R&D Investment: New Evidence from a Firm Level Innovation Study ∗ (2005, background): “effectiveness ( Jaffe 2002 and Hall 2002), and there remain serious methodological issues”
On Young Highly Innovative Companies: Why They Matter and How (Not) to Policy Support Them (2008, unknown): “Klette et al., 2000; David et al., 2000 or Jaffe, 2002 ).”
R&D subsidies and private R&D expenditures: evidence from Italian manufacturing data (2011, background): “Since government grants are likely to be cheaper than funds from the capital markets, firms are encouraged to apply for public support even when private funds are available (Jaffe 2002; Blanes and Busom 2004).”
Do financial constraints threat the innovation process? Evidence from Portuguese firms (2011, background): “Finally, potential correlated unobservables, such as public policy goals and budgets, firms’ applications for subsidy programmes and the quality of the underlying project (Jaffe 2002 ; Schneider and Veugelers 2010 ) imply that treating SUB as endogenous should be considered.”
Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence (2015, unknown): “See also Jaffe (2002).”
Evaluation of credit guarantee policy using propensity score matching (2009, background): “If we cannot control selectivity problem, we might over- or under-estimate the true effect (Jaffe, 2002; Blundell and Costa Dias, 2000).”
Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level? (2009, background): “Private R&D spending can on the other hand only be stimulated if subsidies cause firms to undertake R&D projects that would be unprofitable in the absence of a subsidy (Jaffe, 2002; Wallsten, 2000).”