The Impact of Public Funds on Private R&D Investment: New Evidence from a Firm Level Innovation Study ∗

By Hans Lööf, Almas Heshmati. 2005

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b61c765337d710f9ad2303bf781181792238579f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure (2016, background): “7See also Aerts and Czarnitzki (2004, 2006), Almus and Czarnitzki (2003), Busom (2000), Czarnitzki and Fier (2001), David et al. (2000), Duguet (2004), Garcia-Quevedo (2004), Gonzalez et. al (2005), Gonzalez and Pazo (2008), Lööf and Heshmati (2005), Suetens (2002), and Wallsten (2000).”
The interaction between public and private R&D expenditure and national productivity (2011, background): “…at firm level (see, for example, Higgins and Link, 1981; Link, 1982; Link and Scott, 1998; Toivanen and Niininen, 1998; Wallsten, 1999; Duguet, 2003; Lööf and Heshmati, 2005), at sector level (see, for example, Levin and Reiss, 1984; Lichtenberg, 1984, 1987), and at country level (Kealey, 1996).”
The effects of public support schemes on small and medium enterprises (2015, background): “…Czarnitzki and Fier (2002), Duguet (2004), Fier (2002), Gonzalez and Pazo (2006), Gonzalez et al. (2005), Gorg and Strobl (2007), Hussinger (2008), Loof and Heshmati (2005), Reinkowski et al. (2010), and Herrera and Sánchez-González (2013) reject full crowding-out effects, while Busom (2000),…”
Evaluation of credit guarantee policy using propensity score matching (2009, methodology): “…score matching techniques, which has been developed in labor economics (Dehejia and Wahba, 1999, 2002; Frölich et al., 2004; Heckman et al., 1997; Smith, 2000), and recently has been applied to firm-level studies (Arnold and Hussinger, 2005; Yasar and Rejesus, 2005; Lööf and Heshmati, 2005).”
Two for the price of one? On additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany (2006, background): “Lööf and Heshmati (2005) evaluate the Swedish subsidy policy with nearest neighbor and Kernel matching and reject crowding out effects.”
Political economy of R&D to support the modern competitiveness of nations and determinants of economic optimization and inertia (2012, unknown): “More specifically, the relationship between public and private R&D expenditure has been analyzed at the firm level (Higgins and Link, 1981; Link, 1982; Link and Scott, 1998; Toivanen and Niininen, 1998; Duguet, 2003; Lööf and Heshmati, 2005; Clausen, 2009; Griffiths and Webster, 2010; Hervas-Oliver ”