Assessing the Performance of Conservation Auctions: An Experimental Study

By S. Schilizzi, Uwe Latacz-Lohmann. Land Economics, 2007

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd1dc5f919d98d6d509064b502d9c19d2e27f3e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Stephen Polasky
2. D. Lewis
3. E. Nelson
4. Andrew J. Plantinga
5. John Rolfe
6. Luis C. Rodriguez
7. Jill Windle
8. Stuart Whitten

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Stephen Polasky

In Safety Research

1. Luis C. Rodriguez

Citations in the corpus

• Adapting auctions for the provision of ecosystem services at the landscape scale (2011, background): “Experimental studies show that bidders’ prices tend to rise over repeated discriminatory price auctions (Cason and Gangadharan, 2005; Cummings et al., 2004; Schilizzi and Latacz-Lohmann, 2007).”
• The efficiency of voluntary incentive policies for preventing biodiversity loss (2009, background): “Among voluntary approaches, evidence from experiments fi ds that conservation auctions tend to be more efficient than fixed price contracts when rgulators do not lack full information about landowner payoffs (Cason and Gangadharan 2004, Schillizzi and Latacz-Lohmann 2007).”